Peterson Institute lobby
The Peterson Institute for International Economics is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan
research institution devoted to the study of international economic policy. More › ›
RSS News Feed Search

RealTime Economic Issues Watch

A website forum in which senior fellows of the Peterson Institute for International Economics discuss and debate their responses to global economic and financial developments as they occur each day and offer insights that others might overlook.

Global Financial Crisis

Views on the current crisis in global financial markets, their impact on the real economy and the public policy choices confronting the United States and other countries.

Obama Should Give a Qualified Endorsement to Asian Regionalism

by C. Randall Henning | November 6th, 2009 | 05:11 pm

President Obama’s trip to East Asia over the next two weeks comes at an important time in Asian regionalism. East Asian governments have been moving on several fronts toward regional cooperation and, while some skepticism might be justified, the rest of the world would be wrong to dismiss these developments as [...]

Read full post

A Merit-Based Selection Process for the World Bank and IMF? Don’t Count on It!

by Jacob Funk Kirkegaard | November 4th, 2009 | 05:15 pm

Meeting in London last April, the G-20 leaders declared “that the heads and senior leadership of the international financial institutions [i.e., the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund] should be appointed through an open, transparent, and merit-based selection process [pdf].” When you look at the selection processes for [...]

Read full post

New Fiscal Stimulus Is Not Warranted Now

by Simon Johnson | October 30th, 2009 | 04:54 pm

Yesterday morning I testified to a Joint Economic Committee of Congress hearing (update: that link may be fragile; here’s the JEC general page). The session discussed the latest GDP numbers, the impact of the fiscal stimulus earlier this year, and whether we need further fiscal expansion of any kind.
I argued that [...]

Read full post

Latvia, Lithuania, and the IMF

by Anders Aslund | October 29th, 2009 | 10:00 am

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has had a good year in Eastern Europe. It has been called to help numerous countries and it has acted fast and generously. It has learned several lessons from the East Asia financial crisis of 1997–98, which was very similar. The East European crisis is primarily [...]

Read full post

Is King Euro Naked?

by Carlo Bastasin | October 28th, 2009 | 10:49 am

Europeans may find several historical and theoretical reasons why a political government for the euro area would be desirable. But after the global crisis there are technical reasons why it is more than desirable. That conclusion is a necessity in light of three increasingly important aspects of current monetary developments in [...]

Read full post

Europe’s Banks Still Need Restructuring

by Nicolas Véron | October 26th, 2009 | 10:00 am

Most discussions about financial stability tend to focus on steps to ensure that last year’s meltdown does not happen again, including tighter regulation of capital and compensation policies, prevention of moral hazard through new resolution mechanisms, overhaul of supervisory structures, and reform of governance and disclosures.
But Europe’s policymakers should [...]

Read full post

Low Interest Rates May Be Here To Stay

by Joseph E. Gagnon | October 23rd, 2009 | 09:58 am

One of the most striking features of today’s economy is that interest rates, on everything from bank loans to Treasury bonds, are at 50-year lows. Federal Reserve actions to stabilize the financial system and stimulate economic growth contributed importantly to these low rates. There is much talk lately of the need [...]

Read full post

The Consensus on Big Banks Begins To Move

by Simon Johnson | October 22nd, 2009 | 03:54 pm

Just when our biggest banks thought they were out of the woods and into the money, the official consensus in their favor begins to crack. The Obama administration’s publicly stated view—from the highest level in the White House—remains that the banks cannot or should not be broken up. Their argument is that [...]

Read full post

Boring Banking: Will It Become Bangalore’s Bonus?

by Jacob Funk Kirkegaard | October 14th, 2009 | 09:34 am

After getting bailed out by taxpayers’ billions, banking is clearly viewed by the public and by regulators as needing to become more boring. In other words, to look less like the high return-on-equity sector of yesteryear and more utility-like, perhaps outlawing the most volatile, highly leveraged, and profitable in the short-term [...]

Read full post

Diana Farrell and the White House Theory of Bank Size

by Simon Johnson | October 13th, 2009 | 02:17 pm

On Friday morning (October 9), Diana Farrell—a senior White House official—made a significant statement on NPR’s Morning Edition with regard to whether our largest banks are too big and should be broken up.
“Ms. Diana Farrell (Deputy Assistant for Economy Policy): We understand Simon Johnson’s views on this, and I guess the [...]

Read full post